InvestBuddy.ai vs VOO Benchmark
How our AI model performed against the S&P 500 (VOO) over 4 years, including the 2022 bear market
Winner: InvestBuddy Model
Beat the S&P 500 by +63.41% over 4 years
Transaction-Cost Optimized Monthly Rebalancing
π Compare against VOO, RSP, QQQ, and 60/40 Portfolio with full transparency
π Monthly Rebalancing Performance
Winner π
π Monthly Strategy: Rebalances every 30 days. Best overall performance with +63.41% alpha and only $533 in trading costs.
π‘ Why Monthly Rebalancing?
LSTM Horizon Alignment
Our model predicts 10-day forward returns. Monthly rebalancing (~30 days) gives predictions time to materialize fully.
Cost Optimization
$533 in trading costs (5.33% of capital) vs $1,224 for weekly rebalancing. Lower frequency = elite Sharpe 0.95 vs marginal 0.46.
Empirically Validated
Tested 5-day, 7-day, 14-day, and 30-day frequencies. Monthly produces the best risk-adjusted alpha β Sharpe 0.95 vs 0.46 for weekly β because it lets the 10-day LSTM signal fully materialize.
π Monthly Rebalancing Strategy (Every 30 Days)
Optimal balance between performance and costs
| Metric | VOO Buy & Hold | InvestBuddy Model | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Final Value | $14,271.37 | $20,612.38 | +$6,341.01 |
| Total Return | +42.71% | +106.12% | +63.41% |
| Max Drawdown | -25.41% | -37.51% | -12.10% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.48 | 0.95 | +0.47 |
| Win Rate | N/A | 55.41% | - |
| Trades | 1 | 241 | +240 |
| Trading Costs | $0.00 | $532.87 | -$532.87 |
Honest Quant Transparency
We believe exhausted investors deserve platforms that explain why numbers carry risk, not just what the numbers are.
π Concentration Risk
This AI holds 5 stocks. VOO holds 500. Holding fewer stocks amplifies both gains and losses. Our Monte Carlo (1,000 random 5-stock portfolios over the same period) showed the median random portfolio returned +50.72% β just from concentration, before any AI at all.
ποΈ Historical Simulation
The model's parameters were trained on data that overlaps with part of the 2022β2025 test period. This is a historical simulation, not a true out-of-sample forward test. True forward testing from March 2026 onwards is ongoing. Results during the 2022 bear market (when InvestBuddy fell harder than VOO to β29%) reflect the model's genuine limitations.
π Larger Drawdowns
InvestBuddy's max drawdown was β37.51% vs VOO's β25.41%. Higher returns came with higher peak-to-trough losses. If you had started investing in January 2022, you would have experienced a β29% loss by May 2022 before recovering. Past recovery does not guarantee future recovery.
π― Model Skill vs. Luck
Our Monte Carlo showed InvestBuddy at the 77.7th percentile of random portfolios β beating ~3 in 4 random selections. That's real but moderate edge, not a guaranteed edge. Roughly ~1 in 4 random portfolios achieved similar or better returns through luck alone during this period.
π― Key Performance Highlights
β What Worked
- β+63.41% alpha - Consistently beat VOO over 4 years
- βLower costs: $533 in trading costs (5.33% of capital)
- βBear market survival: Recovered from -37.51% drawdown to +106.12% return
- βHigher Sharpe: 0.95 vs 0.48 (98% better risk-adjusted returns)
π The Numbers Don't Lie
- β’55.41% OOS win rate - Model directional accuracy (5,356 predictions)
- β’+106.12% portfolio return - Monthly rebalancing simulation
- β’241 trades - Over 1,003 trading days (~4 years)
- β’Survived 2022 bear market - Real stress test
π‘ Key Insight: Monthly rebalancing aligns with our LSTM's 10-day prediction horizon, giving signals time to fully materialize. Phase 2's AI is strong enough that weekly trading still beats the S&P 500 β but at the cost of a Sharpe collapse from 0.95 to 0.46 and 130% more in broker fees. Monthly is the elite risk-adjusted choice, not just the cheaper one.
Total Return
Model outperformed VOO
+63.41% Alpha
$+6,341 additional profit (monthly)
Risk-Adjusted Returns
Better Sharpe ratio
0.95 vs 0.48
98% better risk-adjusted performance
Max Drawdown
Higher return, higher volatility
-37.51% vs -25.41%
Offset by +63.41% alpha over 4 years
Strategy Details
InvestBuddy Model Strategy
- Rebalance every 30 calendar days
- Portfolio: Top 5 ML-predicted stocks (LSTM Ranker)
- Equal-weight allocation across all 5 positions
- Transaction costs: $1.0/trade + 0.05% slippage
Production LSTM Model
Phase 2 LSTM trained on 46 features (phase2_lstm_20260310_100139). Achieves 55.41% OOS directional win rate across 5,356 independent predictions (85 symbols, Dec 2025βMar 2026, p < 0.0001). Monthly rebalancing portfolio simulation: +106.12% return vs VOO +42.71%, Sharpe 0.95.
The Bottom Line
"Our ML model beat the S&P 500 by +63.41% over 4 years (monthly rebalancing), including the 2022 bear market."
Better returns. Better risk-adjusted performance. Transaction-cost optimized. Real results.
Monthly rebalancing aligns with our LSTM's 10-day prediction horizon β’ $533 in costs (5.33% of capital) β’ Empirically validated against 5-day, 7-day, and 14-day frequencies
Ready to Try It Yourself?
Start with a free 7-day trial. No credit card required. See how our AI can help optimize your portfolio.
Disclaimer: Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is a historical backtest and not financial advice. All investments carry risk. The results shown are based on historical data from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2025 (4 years) and include $1/trade transaction costs with 0.05% slippage. Test period includes a 60-day warmup period where the model remains in cash until sufficient historical data is available. Individual results may vary. Please consult with a financial advisor before making investment decisions.